We have been hearing “Health is Wealth” in length and
breadth since childhood. But what people around us religiously follow is –
Wealth is wealth!
Recently I read in a newspaper that despite economy
slowdown, the number of ultra-high networth individuals (UHNI) in India has
increased some 15% to 130,000 or so. A person is UHNI if he/she has accumulated
wealth of over Rs. 25 Crores (USD 4.2 million). And the combined wealth of all
these UHNI (in India only) amounts to some 50-60 trillion rupees. Ah, it looks
like more and more people are getting wealthy despite so called economic doom
or gloom. So, for a ‘Below UHNI’ person like me, question is what is this
WEALTH? How is it obtained? And how is it disposed? Most importantly, what is
the purpose of obtaining so much of wealth?
Here is the definition of wealth from Wikipedia: Wealth
is the abundance of valuable resource or material possessions.
Here is an interesting anecdote from Encyclopaedia
Britannica that quotes the famous American wealthy man Andrew Carnegie in his
Gospel of Wealth: a man who accumulates great wealth has a duty to use his
surplus wealth for the improvement of mankind in philanthropic causes. A man
who dies rich dies disgraced.
Well, in my simplistic viewpoint, wealth is those excess
possessions which are over and above what is needed for normal peaceful living.
As I am not a great philosopher or UHNI for that matter, my viewpoint is only
with me. But one thing is crystal clear – the concept of wealth is relative as
also subjective. For someone, wealth might mean hectors of land owned, for some
other land may mean only dirt, whereas precious metals and stones would mean
wealth. This is ‘subjective’ characteristic of wealth. The ‘relative’
characteristic of wealth is quite interesting.
For one who has just come out of a drought village into a
city slum, having a tin roof and walls is a dream of wealth because he strays
on the roadside spending night on the sidewalk. But for one who is living in a
congested dwelling made out of tin sheets, the wealth is a dream of getting
into a concrete 2-room flat having proper door and window, even though toilet
is public shared. He does not seem to consider himself wealthy from the
perspective of the one who is out on the sidewalk. This relative quality of
‘having wealth’ keeps on going to the higher and higher layers of the people.
We know that the richest person in India has recently developed a ’38-storey
building’ house for himself to live! We also read in news that a IT tycoon in
India owns more than 700 apartments in the US. My viewpoint about wealth is
built based on these examples – anything more than one house is unnecessary
surplus in those 38 storeys or 700 apartments. That’s why that is considered as
their wealth.
If wealth means surplus unnecessary possessions, what’s the
purpose of acquiring wealth? If it is a pure curiosity to collect fascinating
things just like a child which collects marbles and shells, I admire that
purpose. A child gets immense satisfaction by collecting his ‘wealth’. As a
child, I was so victorious and joyful to collect wealth of marbles and empty
cartons of cigarettes. But I doubt if such innocent is the purpose of gathering
wealth of the grown up men and women. Who can believe that someone constructed
38-storey building as a house, just out of innocent curiosity? Who can believe
that someone maintains 50 luxury cars in their stable just out of curiosity? And
can it be considered a simple child’s play to treasure hundreds of precious
ornaments in one’s custody? Even the owner of wealth would not take this. So,
what’s the good purpose of acquiring so much of excess, surplus wealth? Why so
many folks boil their blood and exploit others to earn this unnecessary,
practically useless (not worthless) material?
I am at loss to answer this question, can you answer?

Apparantly there are two windows to look at the world - material window and rational window. Since they never face each other, one cannot see through both at the same time. As if they are 90 deg to each other. That's where the panorama (Nazara) from the the two is totally from different directions and hence different and often conflicting. Not necessarily to say that one is correct over the other. In any case thought provoking !
ReplyDeleteSuhas, very nicely projected by you. I agree that there are two - or more - windows through which one can view outside world. There is nothing wrong having different viewpoints of the outside world. But, what about viewing inside self? Does one view at all inside self? If yes, how about different windows to view inside self - possible? Logical?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI liked the post Nishi for various reasons like relevance of the subject, presentation and thought put in it. The question that you put in it is difficult to answer but generally speaking, wealthy people start becoming victims of their own wealth AND resultant social status that the wealth becomes. Therefore they can't stop at nothing as far their life style is concern.
ReplyDeleteWhether they give back to society a part of their wealth or not depends largely upon the way they were born & brought-up and to some extent what values an individual picks up on the path of life.
Your bewilderment about the purpose of amassing useless (if not worthless) wealth is quite understandable.
It is in the nature of human animal to crave for wealth and power. Very few get enlightened and give-up the quest for wealth and power. And some just give-up the hope of making more wealth and power. Both wealth and power have similar qualities that it makes the human animal more violent, more humane or just stoic and incapacitated. I am sure we can relate this to many world leaders of the past and present. If some one is amassing wealth and doing nothing else, then that is a stupid way of living this wonderful life. I think wealth gives its owner a fantastic opportunity to do something for themselves and others before their story on this planet ends. Do something that will satisfy their quest for their purpose on this planet, for many it will satisfy their ego, for a religious person it will get them the points from the almighty. Wealth should flow in some form or the other hopefully for non-violent purposes.
ReplyDeleteArun, thanks for comments. If you closely understand what wealth that we create, you might understand that it is nothing but conversion of some nice natural creation to a useless artificial creation. That is why I am asking what is the purpose behind this frenzy?
ReplyDelete